An influence on the bowl with kufic border from Samarkand is:
A. Chinese porcelain.
B. Korean celadon.
C. Greek pottery.
D. Byzantine mosaic.
I think it's D. Am I right?
Read this very carefully.
http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/objects/4901/Bowl_with_Kufic_Inscription
Make sure you are clear on where each of the countries mentioned are, especially those closest together.
http://www.google.com/search?q=map+of+middle+east&oq=map+of+middle+east&aqs=chrome..69i57.3081j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8
Let us know what you decide.
Hint: Make absolutely sure you are crystal clear on the meanings of the following words:
porcelain
celadon
pottery
mosaic
Chinese Porcelain
To determine the influence on the bowl with the Kufic border from Samarkand, we need to analyze the characteristics of the bowl and its historical context.
Kufic script refers to an early form of Arabic calligraphy that was commonly used in Islam during the medieval period. Samarkand was an important city on the Silk Road, a major trade route that connected different regions and cultures.
To determine the influence on the bowl, we can eliminate options that are not relevant. Greek pottery (option C) is unlikely to be the influence as the Kufic script is associated with Arabic culture, not Greek.
Chinese porcelain (option A) and Korean celadon (option B) are possible influences as both China and Korea were known for their intricate pottery techniques and had significant cultural exchanges with Central Asia along the Silk Road. Celadon pottery is a type of ceramic characterized by its typically green color, which was popular in East Asia.
Byzantine mosaic (option D) refers to the decorative art form in the Byzantine Empire, known for its intricate designs made of small colored glass or stone pieces. Although Byzantine art had significant influence in the region, it is less likely to be the direct influence on the Kufic border of the bowl.
Considering the historical context, cultural connections, and the specific patterns used, it is more likely that the influence on the bowl with the Kufic border from Samarkand is Chinese porcelain (option A) or Korean celadon (option B). However, without more specific information or visual analysis of the bowl, it is difficult to confirm the correct option.
Therefore, it is not possible to definitively determine the correct answer with the given information.