Andrew Jackson, was he really a president who stood up for the "common man" or did he become abusive of power and his office?

Yes.

He was both.

How did he stand up for the whole nation? i can only find things that he did that went in favor with some type of people.

No one can stand up for the whole nation. We are all human beings with hundreds of different ideas and ideals.

To determine whether Andrew Jackson was a president who stood up for the "common man" or became abusive of power, it is necessary to examine historical accounts and primary sources.

1. Research historical accounts: Start by reading biographies, scholarly articles, and history books about Andrew Jackson. Look for authors who present different perspectives on his presidency.

2. Evaluate policies: Assess Jackson's policies to see if they favored the "common man" or if they were potentially abusive of power. Some of his notable policies include the Indian Removal Act, the spoils system, and his opposition to the National Bank.

- Indian Removal Act: This policy forcibly relocated Native American tribes from their ancestral lands, resulting in the tragic Trail of Tears. Assess whether this action was in line with championing the rights of the "common man" or if it abused the power of the presidency.
- Spoils system: Jackson's implementation of the spoils system, where he appointed his loyal supporters to government positions, could be viewed as a way to empower the "common man" and reduce the influence of elites. However, it may also be seen as potentially abusive by rewarding loyalty over qualifications.
- National Bank: Jackson opposed the National Bank, claiming it benefited the wealthy at the expense of the average citizen. The decision to veto the bank's recharter could be interpreted as a stance in favor of the "common man" or as an abuse of power undermining the economic stability.

3. Analyze primary sources: Examine Jackson's letters, speeches, and official documents to gain insight into his motivations, actions, and beliefs. These primary sources can provide direct evidence of Jackson's perspective on matters relating to the "common man" and his exercise of power.

4. Consider historical context: It is important to evaluate Jackson's presidency within the broader historical context. This includes understanding the prevailing political climate, social conditions, and challenges he faced during his time in office.

By critically examining historical accounts, evaluating Jackson's policies, analyzing primary sources, and considering the context of his presidency, one can form a well-rounded understanding of whether he genuinely stood up for the "common man" or if he became abusive of power and his office. Remember, as with any historical figure, there may be differing interpretations and debates surrounding Andrew Jackson's legacy.