Describe some positive and negative events of the trustee period, and provide your own evaluation of the rule of the trustees as either generally a success or a failure.

i have searched online i cant find anything can someone please help out

Read this article very carefully.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trustee_Georgia

Which events do you think are positive? Which are negative?

which section does it say that? i cant find it?

Read! Read! Read!

It takes most people longer than 2 minutes to read that article carefully!!!

can you just please tell me the answer>?

It's this kind of irresponsible and repugnant begging for answers that got you banned last week.

Don't cheat yourself out of an education. Do your own work!

burn

Don't be a jerk!

Umm that's Wikipedia and you can change it so yea

During the trustee period, which took place in the early 18th century, the Georgia colony was under the governance of a board of trustees appointed by King George II. Here are some positive and negative events of the trustee period:

Positive events:
1. Establishment of Savannah: The trustees successfully founded the city of Savannah, which served as the capital of the Georgia colony and became an important center for trade and commerce.
2. Economic development: Efforts were made to establish various industries, including silk production, wine-making, and the cultivation of exotic crops. Although many of these initiatives were not successful in the long term, they demonstrated the trustees' commitment to economic growth.
3. Peaceful relations with Native Americans: The trustees maintained peaceful relationships with Native American tribes, such as the Creek, Choctaw, and Chickasaw, which helped to ensure stability in the region.

Negative events:
1. Restrictions on land ownership: The trustees imposed significant restrictions on land ownership, including limitations on the size of land grants and a ban on the buying and selling of land. These restrictions hindered the development of a prosperous agrarian society in Georgia.
2. Slavery prohibition: The trustees outlawed slavery in Georgia, which impeded the development of large-scale plantation agriculture and the economic prosperity that slavery brought to other Southern colonies.
3. Inadequate funding: The trustees faced financial challenges, largely due to insufficient funding and inadequate resources. This limited their ability to effectively govern and provide necessary infrastructure and services.

Evaluation of the rule of the trustees:
The evaluation of the rule of the trustees during the trustee period largely depends on one's perspective and priorities. Some argue that the trustees had positive intentions and made genuine efforts to establish a utopian society in Georgia, while others criticize their policies as overly restrictive and inconsistent.

Considering the positive aspects, such as the establishment of Savannah and the emphasis on peaceful relations with Native Americans, it could be argued that the trustees' rule had some successes. However, the negative aspects, such as the restrictions on land ownership and the prohibition of slavery, hindered the colony's economic development.

Overall, while the trustees had some commendable initiatives, the trustee period can be seen as a mixed bag. Their well-intentioned policies sometimes fell short and impeded the colony's growth potential. Therefore, it can be evaluated as a moderate failure, as the desired outcomes were not fully achieved.