which is a better thesis

A. Because it has become outdated, the electoral college should be replaced by a system that allows the US president to be elected by direct popular vote.
B. Rather than voting for a presidential candidate, voters in a US presidential election merely choose their state's electoral college representatives, who actually vote for the president. In most states, all of the electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state, no matter how close the outcome.

A is much better.

B is too long and wordy.

Determining which thesis is better depends on your perspective and the specific context in which the thesis is being used. However, I will explain the strengths and weaknesses of both thesis statements so you can make an informed decision.

Thesis A: "Because it has become outdated, the electoral college should be replaced by a system that allows the US president to be elected by direct popular vote."

Strengths:
1. It clearly states the position by advocating for the replacement of the electoral college with direct popular vote.
2. It identifies the problem, suggesting that the electoral college has become outdated and needs to be replaced.
3. It addresses the current system's limitations by proposing an alternative.

Weaknesses:
1. It does not provide specific evidence or counterarguments against the electoral college system.
2. It does not explain the potential consequences or benefits of switching to a direct popular vote system.

Thesis B: "Rather than voting for a presidential candidate, voters in a US presidential election merely choose their state's electoral college representatives, who actually vote for the president. In most states, all of the electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state, no matter how close the outcome."

Strengths:
1. It provides an objective description of how the electoral college system works, highlighting the fact that voters choose electors who then choose the president.
2. It emphasizes the winner-takes-all nature of most states' electoral votes, regardless of the margin of victory.

Weaknesses:
1. It does not present an argument or proposal for change, leaving it open-ended without a clear stance.
2. It does not address the potential problems or concerns associated with the described electoral college system.

Ultimately, Thesis A is more persuasive and better streamlined as it explicitly presents a problem and advocates for a specific solution. However, it is important to remember that the quality of a thesis also depends on the evidence and arguments presented in its supporting paragraphs.