A company that manufactures bicycles estimates that the profit P (in dollars) for selling a particular model is given by the equation shown below, where x is the advertising expense (in tens of thousands of dollars).

P = –35x3 + 2500x2 – 275000, 0 ≤ x ≤ 50
Using this model, find the smaller of two advertising amounts that will yield a profit of $850,000. (Round your answer to the nearest thousands of dollars.)
$

To find the smaller advertising amount that will yield a profit of $850,000, we need to set up the equation:

P = 850,000

We can substitute this value into the equation for profit and solve for the advertising expense (x):

850,000 = -35x^3 + 2500x^2 - 275,000

Rearranging the equation, we get:

35x^3 - 2500x^2 + 275,000 + 850,000 = 0

Simplifying the equation, we have:

35x^3 - 2500x^2 + 1,125,000 = 0

Now, we can use a numerical method or a graphing calculator to solve for x. Using a graphing calculator, we find that the two advertising amounts that will yield a profit of $850,000 are approximately x = 21.327 and x = 43.569.

Therefore, the smaller advertising amount that will yield a profit of $850,000 is approximately $21,327.

To find the advertising amount that will yield a profit of $850,000, we need to solve the given equation for P = 850,000.

The equation is P = -35x^3 + 2500x^2 - 275000.

So, we need to solve the equation -35x^3 + 2500x^2 - 275000 = 850,000.

To solve this equation, we can set it equal to zero and rearrange it to form a cubic equation.

-35x^3 + 2500x^2 - 275000 - 850,000 = 0

-35x^3 + 2500x^2 - 1125000 = 0

Now, we can use numerical methods or a graphing calculator to solve this equation. However, since we need to find the smaller of the two advertising amounts, we can narrow down our search range from 0 ≤ x ≤ 50.

We can start by substituting values of x within this range into the equation and checking if the result is close to zero or not until we find the two values that bracket the root.

Let's start by substituting x = 0, 10, 20, ..., 50 into the equation and find the values of P for each substitution.

Substituting x = 0, we get P = -275,000.

Substituting x = 10, we get P = -255,000.

Substituting x = 20, we get P = -135,000.

Substituting x = 30, we get P = 45,000.

Substituting x = 40, we get P = 405,000.

Substituting x = 50, we get P = 725,000.

Since the profit P is negative for x = 0, and it increases as x increases, we can see that the smaller advertising amount that will yield a profit of $850,000 lies between x = 40 and x = 50.

To get a more accurate estimate, we can use interpolation or other numerical methods to find the value of x that yields a profit of $850,000. However, for rounding purposes, let's take the midpoint between x = 40 and x = 50, which is x = 45.

Substituting x = 45 into the equation, we can find the corresponding profit P:

P = -35(45)^3 + 2500(45)^2 - 275000

P ≈ 955,625

Since the profit P is greater than $850,000, we need to find a smaller advertising amount.

From our initial estimation, we can conclude that the smaller advertising amount is between x = 40 and x = 45.

To get a more accurate estimate, we can continue using interpolation or other numerical methods. However, for rounding purposes, let's take the midpoint between x = 40 and x = 45, which is x = 42.5.

Substituting x = 42.5 into the equation, we can find the corresponding profit P:

P = -35(42.5)^3 + 2500(42.5)^2 - 275000

P ≈ 838,828

Since the profit P is less than $850,000, we can conclude that the smaller advertising amount that will yield a profit of $850,000 (rounded to the nearest thousands of dollars) is $42,000.

Just solve

-35x^3 + 2500x^2 - 275000 = 850000

using your favorite numeric method, or a graphing utility such as

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-35x^3+%2B+2500x^2+-+275000+%3D+850000