Posted by **Dawn ** on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 at 9:36pm.

A student argues that a p% increase in salary followed by a q% decrease is equivalent to a q% decrease followed by a p% increase because of the commutative property of multiplication. How do you respond?

- MATH1112 -
**Steve**, Thursday, September 4, 2014 at 12:21am
In the first case, we have

(1+p)(1-q)

In the second case, we have

(1-q)(1+p)

Looks the same to me, and for the stated reason.

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- MATH213 - 12. A student argues that a p% increase in salary followed by a q% ...
- Finance - ____ in the beta coefficient normally causes____ in the required ...
- accounting - Identify whether a debit or credit yields the indicated change for ...
- chemistry- can you check my answers? - can you please check my answers?? 9. For ...
- Business Environment and Recording Transactions - Give an example of a business ...
- Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...
- Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...
- Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...
- Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...
- Chemistry - A change cannot occur spontaneously if it is accompanied by: A. An ...

More Related Questions