Which of the following is NOT a constraint on federal judicial power?


A. Lifetime appointment


B. Presidential nomination


C. Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors


D. Congressional control of judicial jurisdiction

I think it's C., but not positive

How does Presidential nomination constrain Judicial power? Once confirmed, the President has no authority over them.

You are correct. The answer is C. Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. This is because impeachment is a check on the executive and legislative branches of government, not a constraint on federal judicial power. The other options, A. Lifetime appointment, B. Presidential nomination, and D. Congressional control of judicial jurisdiction, are all constraints on federal judicial power.

To determine which of the options is NOT a constraint on federal judicial power, let's explore each option:

A. Lifetime appointment: This is a constraint on federal judicial power. Once appointed to the federal judiciary, judges typically serve for life, ensuring their independence from political pressures.

B. Presidential nomination: This is also a constraint on federal judicial power. Judges are nominated by the President and must go through a confirmation process by the Senate, which helps maintain a system of checks and balances.

C. Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors: This is a constraint on federal judicial power. Federal judges can be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office by the Senate if they engage in misconduct or commit "high crimes and misdemeanors."

D. Congressional control of judicial jurisdiction: This can be seen as a constraint on federal judicial power. Congress has the authority to determine the jurisdiction of federal courts and can pass laws that limit their powers.

So, based on the analysis of the options, the correct answer is C. Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors, which is a constraint on federal judicial power.