Following the Spanish-American War, and especially in regard to American occupation of the Philippines, most anti-imperialists argued that


A. the occupation would lead to unhealthy racial mixing.
B. installing tyranny abroad would encourage tyranny at home.
C. cheap, imported Filipino laborers would take American jobs.
D. because all war was immoral, the fruits of war were tainted.

B?

What does your book say?

To answer this question, we can analyze the given options and consider historical context.

Option A suggests that anti-imperialists argued that the occupation would lead to unhealthy racial mixing. However, it is important to note that concerns about racial mixing were generally not one of the primary arguments made by anti-imperialists during this time. While racial attitudes did exist and played a role in imperialism, it was not a central focus of anti-imperialist arguments.

Option B suggests that anti-imperialists argued that installing tyranny abroad would encourage tyranny at home. This argument aligns with the concerns of many anti-imperialists during this time. Critics of American imperialism believed that by engaging in overseas colonization and exerting control over other nations, the United States risked compromising its own democratic values and principles. They believed that the practice of imperialism would lead to the erosion of civil liberties at home.

Option C suggests that anti-imperialists argued that cheap, imported Filipino laborers would take American jobs. While concerns over competition for jobs did exist, this was not a primary argument made by most anti-imperialists. Economic factors were certainly discussed, but the main focus of anti-imperialist arguments tended to be centered around moral and political concerns.

Option D suggests that anti-imperialists argued that the fruits of war were tainted because all war was immoral. This argument also aligns with the perspective of many anti-imperialists. They believed that war itself was inherently immoral, and therefore any gains or benefits resulting from war, such as acquiring overseas territories, were tainted.

Based on historical context and the primary concerns of anti-imperialists, the most accurate option is B. Anti-imperialists argued that installing tyranny abroad would encourage tyranny at home, reflecting their concerns about compromising democratic principles as a result of imperialistic practices.