Which of the following, according to Carl Klockars, is NOT an important consideration in determining whether the good ends of police work justify immoral means in a given scenario?

A. Are there other, non-dirty, means that may be effective but that we may be overlooking?

B. How certain are we that the dirty means will, in fact, bring about the good outcome?

C. In addition to the good consequences that the dirty method will produce, are there likely to be unintended consequences that might cause undesirable harms?

D. How high a score will the dirty means reach on the felicity calculus?

Pretty sure its D., but need a second opinion.

What about C? Certainly dirty methods don't always produce good results.

To determine the correct answer to the question, we need to refer to Carl Klockars' viewpoint on important considerations in determining whether the good ends of police work justify immoral means in a given scenario. To find this information, you can conduct a search using a reputable search engine or access relevant scholarly articles or books that discuss Klockars' perspective.

Once you have found the relevant information, examine Klockars' stance on the considerations listed in the answer choices. Evaluate whether each consideration is discussed, and whether it is considered important or not by Klockars. By doing this, you will be able to identify which consideration is NOT considered important in determining whether the good ends of police work justify immoral means.

Based on the provided answer choices, Klockars would likely consider options A, B, and C to be important considerations in making this determination. However, option D, which mentions the "felicity calculus," does not align with Klockars' perspective. Therefore, the correct answer is likely D.

Remember, the best approach to confirm the answer is to research and understand Carl Klockars' viewpoints directly to avoid any potential misinterpretation.