The argument that aiding or assisting others might be degrading to them, implying that they are incapable of helping themselves, is an argument commonly used to support:

A. Qualitative varieties of utilitarianism.
B. Hedonism.
C. Ethical egoism
D. Plea bargaining.

My answer is A, but not 100% sure.

I agree with A.

To determine the correct answer, let's break down the options and focus on the argument that aiding or assisting others might be degrading to them, implying their incapability of helping themselves.

A. Qualitative varieties of utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is a moral theory that focuses on maximizing utility or overall happiness for the greatest number of people. Qualitative utilitarianism places importance on qualitative factors like dignity, respect, and individual choice. The argument that assisting others might degrade them aligns with the concern for dignity and respect, suggesting that aiding others may be degrading. Therefore, Option A is a possible choice.

B. Hedonism: Hedonism is a philosophical doctrine stating that pleasure is the highest good and the ultimate aim of life. While hedonism may prioritize individual pleasure, the argument about aiding or assisting others being degrading does not directly align with hedonistic principles.

C. Ethical egoism: Ethical egoism suggests that individuals ought to act in their own self-interest. The argument that assisting others might be degrading does not necessarily align with the principles of ethical egoism, as the focus is more on personal benefit rather than the perceived degradation of others.

D. Plea bargaining: Plea bargaining is a legal process where a defendant can negotiate a reduced sentence by pleading guilty. This option does not relate to the argument of aiding or assisting and is unrelated to the context.

Based on the analysis, it appears that Option A, qualitative varieties of utilitarianism, is the most logical choice as it aligns with the argument presented.