A research study being conducted to test the effects of administering nicotine to healthy volunteers, who have never smoked, nor used any tobacco products, on their attention and memory would most likely require which level of IRB review? (Points : 1)
Exempt
Expedited
Full-Board
No review is necessary
My answer is full board
I agree.
Full Board
You are correct! A research study that involves administering nicotine to healthy volunteers who have never smoked, nor used any tobacco products, would most likely require Full-Board review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).
The reason for this is that the study involves a potentially risky intervention (administering nicotine), and it is important to thoroughly assess the potential risks and benefits of the study before it can be approved. Full-Board review involves a comprehensive evaluation by a committee of experts, which ensures that the rights and welfare of the participants are protected.
To determine the appropriate level of IRB review for a research study, researchers typically submit a protocol outlining the study design, procedures, risks, and benefits to the IRB. The IRB then assesses the protocol to determine the level of review required, which could be Exempt, Expedited, or Full-Board review, based on the nature of the study and potential risks involved.
In this case, given the potential risks associated with administering nicotine to individuals who have never used tobacco products, it is reasonable to expect that Full-Board review would be necessary to thoroughly evaluate the study and ensure participant safety.