Answers:
-Why is it fair to day France was more "revolutionary" under Robespierre than America was under George Washington?
~It is fair to say France was more revolutionary because....
-What is irony of the French Revolution?
~Robespierre and Napoleon rose to power.
-Why does "live by the sword,die by the sword" apply to Robespierre?
- Because Robespierre rose to power through violence and died through violence.
Can someone please help me?
To answer the question of why it is fair to say France was more "revolutionary" under Robespierre than America was under George Washington, we need to consider the nature and extent of the changes that occurred in each country during their respective revolutionary periods.
In France, under the leadership of Maximilien Robespierre, the French Revolution witnessed a radical transformation of the social, political, and economic structure of the country. The monarchy was overthrown, feudal privileges were abolished, and the country went through a period of intense political turmoil. The revolutionaries aimed to create a more egalitarian society based on the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity.
On the other hand, the American Revolution led by George Washington primarily sought to achieve independence from British colonial rule and establish a system of self-governance. While it brought about significant changes in terms of political structures and rights, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, it did not entail a complete overhaul of the social and economic order within the United States.
Therefore, one can argue that France was more revolutionary under Robespierre because the changes that occurred were more profound and transformative in nature compared to the relatively more limited scope of change in America under George Washington.
Moving on to the question about the irony of the French Revolution, it is indeed ironic that figures like Robespierre and Napoleon rose to power during a revolution that aimed to bring about greater equality and democracy. Both Robespierre and Napoleon initially claimed to be champions of the revolution's ideals, but eventually became authoritarian leaders. This irony lies in the fact that the French Revolution, which sought to overthrow the absolute authority of the monarchy, ultimately paved the way for dictatorial regimes.
Lastly, let's address the question of why the phrase "live by the sword, die by the sword" applies to Robespierre. This saying suggests that those who use violent means to gain power or establish their rule are likely to face violent consequences themselves. Robespierre's rise to power during the French Revolution was marked by the use of violence and the establishment of the Reign of Terror, where many perceived enemies were executed. However, his reign of terror eventually led to a backlash, and he himself was arrested and executed in 1794. Therefore, it can be argued that the violent methods he employed to gain power ultimately contributed to his downfall, thus exemplifying the principle of "live by the sword, die by the sword."