3. Which of the following methods of reporting research is not followed by most scientists?
(Points : 1)
publishing a research paper online
publishing a research paper in print
holding a press conference
presenting a talk at a meeting
Question 4. 4. Who decides whether a paper gets published in a scientific journal?
(Points : 1)
author
editor
reviewers
publisher
Question 5. 5. Which of the following is an informal presentation of a physicist's scientific findings?
(Points : 1)
published scientific paper in print
lecture at a scientific meeting
published scientific paper online
poster presentation at a scientific meeting
holding a press conference
editor
3.a
4.B
5.c
Question 3:
To determine which method of reporting research is not followed by most scientists, we can look at each option and consider its commonality among scientists.
- Publishing a research paper online: This is a common method of reporting research, as it allows for widespread accessibility and dissemination of scientific findings.
- Publishing a research paper in print: Similarly, publishing a research paper in print is also a widely utilized method for reporting research. Many scientific journals still publish physical copies of their papers.
- Holding a press conference: While holding a press conference can be an effective way to communicate research findings to the public, it is not typically the primary method used by most scientists to report their research. Press conferences are often used for high-profile research announcements or breakthroughs.
- Presenting a talk at a meeting: This is a common method of reporting research among scientists. Sharing research findings through presentations at scientific meetings allows for direct interaction with colleagues, feedback, and further discussion of the research.
Therefore, the method of reporting research that is not followed by most scientists is holding a press conference.
Question 4:
To determine who decides whether a paper gets published in a scientific journal, we can consider the typical publication process.
- Author: The author of the paper submits their work to the scientific journal for consideration, but they are not solely responsible for the decision to publish it.
- Editor: The editor of the scientific journal plays a crucial role in deciding whether a paper meets the journal's standards and aligns with its scope. They evaluate the paper's quality, relevance, and suitability for publication.
- Reviewers: Reviewers are experts in the field who assess the submitted paper. They provide feedback, critique, and recommendations to the editor regarding the paper's scientific rigor, methodology, analysis, and interpretation. The reviewers' evaluations are instrumental in the decision-making process.
- Publisher: While the publisher oversees the production and distribution of the journal, they do not typically have the final say in whether a paper gets published. The publisher's role is more administrative in nature.
Therefore, it is the editor who ultimately decides whether a paper gets published in a scientific journal.
Question 5:
To identify which option is an informal presentation of a physicist's scientific findings, let's examine each choice:
- Published scientific paper in print: This option refers to a formal and traditional way of presenting research findings, typically involving peer-reviewed journals and thorough scientific reporting.
- Lecture at a scientific meeting: This option involves a physicist giving a talk or presentation at a scientific conference or meeting. While this may be less formal than a published paper, it is still considered a formal presentation of scientific findings.
- Published scientific paper online: Similar to a published paper in print, this option refers to a formal presentation of research findings and is not classified as an informal presentation.
- Poster presentation at a scientific meeting: This option involves creating a visual display of research findings on a poster board and presenting it at a scientific meeting. Poster presentations are generally considered informal, allowing for more interactive discussions and less formal presentation styles.
Therefore, the correct answer is a poster presentation at a scientific meeting, as it represents an informal presentation of a physicist's scientific findings.