What was the connection between type of economy and support of the Constitution?

1 Merchants with foreign trade partners typically opposed the Constitution, while property holders supported strong national powers at the federal level.

2Semisubsistence farmers in rural areas typically were suspicious of a strong centralized government, while people living in commercial economies supported national powers.

3Artisans in eastern seaboard cities typically opposed the Constitution, while wealthy planters in the South supported a strong national government with many powers.

4Immigrants who made wages typically were suspicious of a strong centralized government, while farmers who bartered typically supported the Constitution.

When?

In the 1790s?
In the 1840s?
Or ... ?

The answer to this question can be found by analyzing the relationship between different economic groups and their attitudes towards the Constitution. By understanding the historical context and the interests of these groups, we can determine the connection between the type of economy and the support for the Constitution.

1. Merchants with foreign trade partners typically opposed the Constitution, while property holders supported strong national powers at the federal level:
Merchants with foreign trade partners often benefited from a decentralized government that allowed for more favorable trade policies and fewer regulations. They were concerned that a strong central government might impose restrictions on their trade activities. Property holders, on the other hand, supported a strong national government because it could protect their property rights and provide stability for their investments.

2. Semisubsistence farmers in rural areas typically were suspicious of a strong centralized government, while people living in commercial economies supported national powers:
Semisubsistence farmers relied heavily on self-sufficiency and were often wary of a strong central government's potential interference with their way of life. They favored local control and limited government intervention. In contrast, people living in commercial economies, such as cities and towns engaged in trade and commerce, saw the benefits of a strong national government that could regulate and promote economic activities.

3. Artisans in eastern seaboard cities typically opposed the Constitution, while wealthy planters in the South supported a strong national government with many powers:
Artisans in eastern seaboard cities were concerned that a strong central government might favor larger, more established businesses and undermine their own economic interests. They preferred local control and protection of their smaller-scale enterprises. Wealthy planters in the South, however, recognized the need for a strong national government to protect their interests in agriculture, including maintaining slavery and protecting trade regulations.

4. Immigrants who made wages typically were suspicious of a strong centralized government, while farmers who bartered typically supported the Constitution:
Immigrants who made wages often faced economic challenges and believed that a strong central government might prioritize the interests of the wealthy rather than protecting their rights as workers. On the other hand, farmers who bartered had a more self-sufficient economic model and saw the benefits of a strong national government that could regulate trade, promote economic growth, and protect their rights.

Overall, the type of economy played a significant role in shaping attitudes towards the Constitution. Economic interests and concerns influenced people's support or opposition to a strong central government, leading to different positions on the Constitution among various economic groups.