1. If I had brought an umbrella, I would not have gotten wet.
2. If I had brought an umbrella, I would not have been wet.
3. If I had brought an umbrella, I would have stopped rain from falling on me.
4. If I had brought an umbrella, I would not have soaked with water.
5. If I had brought an umbrella, I would have remained dry.
(Are they all grammatical? Check them,please.)
In 4, you need "would not have been ... "
Everything else is fine.
All of the sentences you provided are grammatically correct. However, there are slight differences in meaning and usage.
1. If I had brought an umbrella, I would not have gotten wet.
This sentence indicates that the speaker did not bring an umbrella and as a result, they got wet. It implies a cause-and-effect relationship between not having an umbrella and getting wet.
2. If I had brought an umbrella, I would not have been wet.
Similar to the first sentence, this sentence also implies a cause-and-effect relationship. However, it emphasizes the state of being wet rather than just getting wet. It suggests that if the speaker had brought an umbrella, they would have avoided being wet altogether.
3. If I had brought an umbrella, I would have stopped rain from falling on me.
This sentence implies that bringing an umbrella would have prevented rain from falling directly on the speaker. It suggests that the umbrella would have acted as a shield against the rain.
4. If I had brought an umbrella, I would not have soaked with water.
In this sentence, "soaked with water" implies being completely drenched. It suggests that if the speaker had brought an umbrella, they would have avoided being completely wet.
5. If I had brought an umbrella, I would have remained dry.
This sentence indicates that bringing an umbrella would have allowed the speaker to stay dry throughout the rain. It implies a continuous state of being dry rather than just avoiding getting wet.
Overall, all of the sentences convey similar ideas about avoiding getting wet with different nuances.