Discuss the social and psychological implications of taking a strictly nature view and the social and psychological implication of taking a nurture view?

How would you like us to help you with this assignment?

To perhaps provide any suggestions on how it applies

How what applies to what?

social and psychological of nature and nurture

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_versus_nurture

Nature traits essentially cannot be changed for that individual (at least, not yet), but the nurture aspects can be modified. What can be learned can be unlearned.

The nature vs. nurture debate is a longstanding discussion in the fields of social and psychological sciences. It revolves around the relative influence of genetics (nature) and environmental factors (nurture) in shaping human behavior, personality traits, and other aspects of human development.

Taking a strictly nature view means attributing most, if not all, of a person's characteristics and behaviors to their genetic makeup. This perspective suggests that individuals are born with innate traits that largely determine their personality, intelligence, and potential for certain abilities. Supporters of this view argue that genetic predispositions, such as intelligence or temperament, play a significant role in shaping an individual's social and psychological development.

The social and psychological implications of a nature view can include:

1. Implications for social inequalities: If individual differences are primarily determined by genetics, this view may reinforce social inequalities by suggesting that some people are inherently superior or inferior to others based on their genetic traits. This can have implications for issues such as education, career opportunities, and social mobility.

2. Reduced emphasis on environmental influences: The focus on genetics in a nature view may undervalue the importance of environmental factors in human development. Factors such as parenting styles, socioeconomic status, cultural norms, and life experiences can significantly shape an individual's behavior and psychological well-being. Ignoring these influences may hinder efforts to provide support and interventions aimed at improving social conditions and psychological well-being.

On the other hand, taking a nurture view emphasizes the significance of environmental factors in shaping human behavior and psychological traits. This perspective suggests that individuals are primarily products of their upbringing, experiences, and social influences. According to this view, genetics play a smaller role and individuals are molded by their cultural, familial, and societal interactions.

The social and psychological implications of a nurture view can include:

1. Opportunities for intervention and change: If environmental factors are viewed as the primary determinants of human behavior, this perspective highlights the potential for interventions and social policies to improve individuals' lives. It implies that altering social conditions, providing support, and offering appropriate environments can promote positive development and well-being.

2. Responsiveness to social context: A nurture view recognizes that individuals' behavior and psychological traits can be influenced and modified by changing social circumstances. This understanding encourages a focus on creating inclusive and supportive environments, addressing social injustices, and fostering psychological well-being in individuals and communities.

However, it is worth noting that the nature vs. nurture debate is highly complex and most researchers and experts acknowledge that both genetics and environment interact and contribute to human development. Modern perspectives tend to emphasize the interaction between nature and nurture, considering their interplay rather than focusing on one extreme over the other.