i have a question that is similar to the one you helped me in

You'll need to be more specific than this!!!

i'm still confused on the methods, persuaive appeals, structual elements, etc. i know that the following article it doesn't have a counterargument, but i don't know the rest, what is the argument, call to action, claims, examples and evidence, counterargument, rebuttal

the final bell rings. it's the last day of school, and summer has finally come! students don't don't have to think about school for at least another 2 1/2 months. that is the way it should always be. schools should continue using the traditional calender and not a year-round schedule. there are numerous downsides to year-round schooling. it has no positive effect on education. it adds to costs, and it disrupts the long-awaited summer vacation.

contrary to the well-accepted bleief, a year round schooling has no constructive impact on education. most year-round scedules use the 45-15 methods. 45 days of school followed by 15 days off. because of this there are many first and last days of school. all those transaction disrupt the learning process. also, there is no evidence of higher test scores. due to that, many schools that change to year-round schedules end up swiching back. for ex; since 1980, 95 percent of schools that tried the year-round schedule changed back to a traditional calender. it is obvious that changing to year-round schooling does not help students; therfore, why is the change necessary.

like any other facility, keeping a school open requires a great deal of money. when a school changes to a year-round scedule, the cost skyrocket. keeping a school open in the middle of summer requires air conditioning, and that adds significantly to the school's expenses. the usual utility bill grow because of the additional open-school time. finally, teachers must be paid for all the weeks they are working. with all these factors, the cost of keeping schools open become immensely high. For ex, a high school in arizona had a cost increase of $157,000 when they switched to year-round schooling. some schools may not be able to handle such increase, and other schools that can handle these expenses could be doing better things with that money. is year-round school really where the money should go?

an important part of a child's life is summertime. with year-round schedules, students would hardly have any time to relax. during the 15-day breaks, they would be thinking about their quick return to school. it would also be difficult to coordinate family vacations with parents work schedules. similarly children will not be able to go to most summer camps. one expert, Dr. Peter Scales, says, "the biggest plus of camp is that camps help young people discover and explore their talents, interest, and values. most schools don't satisfy all these needs. kids who have these kinds of [camp] experiences end up being healtheir and having fewer problems." Obviously, the summer is crucial to a childs learning and development. why should this invaluable part of a young person's life be taken away?

it is evident that year-round schooling is not the best option for the school calender. there is absolutly nothing wrong with the traditional school year. why change something that works so well? the final bell rings. let's make sure this bell means that the "real" summer vacation has come.

Sure, I'll be happy to help! Please go ahead and ask your question.