What were some of the good things Oliver Cromwell did? Bad things? And also what is you opinion on whether he was a hero or villain? I think I am choosing to write about him being a hero because I guess every ruler has it's flairs and flaws, but I just don't know what three reasons I should write about!

Read through some of these sites to help you find three reasons he was a hero.

http://www.google.com/search?q=Baldessari's+Six+Colorful+Inside+Jobs&rlz=1C1AVSX_enUS414US423&oq=Baldessari's+Six+Colorful+Inside+Jobs&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l2.667j0&sourceid=chrome&espvd=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#es_sm=122&q=Oliver+Cromwell+hero

ok, thank you! But I just read over my criteria and it said that I must include whether he was a person of high moral principles or not and what they were...

Oliver Cromwell, the English military and political leader, played a significant role during the English Civil War and the subsequent Interregnum period. Evaluating him as a hero or villain is subjective, as it depends on one's perspective and values. However, it is important to consider both the positive and negative aspects of Cromwell's actions. To help you with your decision and provide three reasons to consider him as a hero, I'll explain how you can approach this topic and explore different points of view.

1. Military Leadership: One reason to consider Cromwell as a hero is his exceptional military leadership. He was instrumental in the Parliamentarian victory during the English Civil War. To highlight this aspect, you could explore his strategic brilliance, such as his innovative use of the "New Model Army" and his decisive victories in key battles, like the Battle of Naseby in 1645.

To gather information on this topic, you can start by researching Cromwell's military campaigns, studying specific battles he participated in, and examining primary sources that provide insights into his military tactics.

2. Defense of Parliamentary Democracy: Another aspect to consider is Cromwell's commitment to parliamentary democracy. He played a crucial role in the execution of King Charles I and the establishment of the Commonwealth of England. Cromwell aimed to limit the power of the monarchy and advocate for a republican government based on democratic principles. This can be seen as a progressive step towards greater political representation.

To explore this viewpoint, you can investigate Cromwell's role in the trial and execution of Charles I, study the constitutional reforms and religious toleration initiatives during his protectorate, and analyze his relationship with Parliament.

3. Religious Freedom and Toleration: Cromwell's policies regarding religious toleration were relatively progressive for his time. He fostered a more inclusive environment, allowing various Christian denominations and even Jewish communities to practice their faith without persecution. This commitment to religious freedom can be seen as a positive aspect of his leadership.

To delve deeper into this topic, you can examine Cromwell's religious beliefs, his interactions with different religious groups, and the impact of his policies on religious tolerance during the Interregnum period.

By exploring these three aspects of Cromwell's life and leadership, you can present a compelling argument for considering him as a hero. Remember to back up your points with evidence from reputable sources and present a well-balanced view, considering alternative perspectives.

Ultimately, whether Cromwell is viewed as a hero or villain is subjective and open to interpretation. Be sure to engage with different sources, evaluate various viewpoints, and critically analyze the available evidence to form a well-rounded opinion.