Please help I need clarity on how to tackle this assignment

The assignment is titled:

“Organisational and Individual Performance: Seminal and Contemporary Theory and Practice.”
Critically evaluate and analyse the HRM literature and provide an argument for how you would, as a newly appointed Human Resources Manager, improve individual and organisational performance in an organisation of your choice. Ensure that you critically evaluate theory and also previous empirical evidence in your evaluation and provide support for your arguments.
Also: Track changes in the HRM literature that relate to the management of performance: from the origins of the field up to the current state of the field in 2013.

#1 ~~> "Critically evaluate and analyse the HRM literature..."

Until you do that, you cannot begin on the rest.

We have no access to your textbook or course materials, so only you can do this. I'd read it all, three or four times, and outline it.
http://classroom.synonym.com/outline-college-textbook-readings-4249.html

Once you have all that under control -- on paper and in your mind -- you can begin the rest of the assignment.

Tackling this assignment requires a systematic approach that involves research, analysis, and critical thinking. Below, I will outline the steps you can take to complete this assignment effectively:

1. Understand the assignment brief: Start by thoroughly reading and understanding the assignment brief. Pay attention to the specific requirements, such as critically evaluating HRM literature, analyzing theories and empirical evidence, providing arguments, and tracking changes in the HRM literature.

2. Choose an organization: Select an organization of your choice that will serve as the basis for your analysis. Consider an organization that you are familiar with or interested in, as this will make the assignment more engaging for you.

3. Research HRM literature: Begin your research by exploring a wide range of HRM literature. This can include academic journals, books, reputable websites, and research databases. Look for sources that discuss organizational and individual performance, theories on HRM, and evidence of HRM practices that improve performance.

4. Evaluate theories and empirical evidence: Critically evaluate the theories and empirical evidence you find during your research. Compare and contrast different theories and their implications for organizational and individual performance. Assess the quality and validity of empirical evidence by considering factors such as sample size, research methodology, and relevance to your selected organization.

5. Develop arguments: Based on your evaluation of the theories and empirical evidence, develop arguments for how you, as a newly appointed Human Resources Manager, would improve individual and organizational performance in your chosen organization. Support your arguments with the research and evidence you have gathered.

6. Track changes in HRM literature: In addition to evaluating theories and evidence, track changes in the HRM literature over time. Start from the origins of the field and trace its development up to the current state in 2013. Look for trends, advancements, and shifts in focus within the HRM literature, particularly regarding performance management.

7. Structure your assignment: Organize your assignment in a logical structure that presents your arguments and supporting evidence clearly. Consider using headings and subheadings to guide the reader through your analysis. Make sure to include a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion that summarizes your findings.

8. Use proper referencing: As you integrate information from the HRM literature and external sources, ensure that you cite and reference them correctly using a consistent referencing style (such as APA or MLA). This will avoid plagiarism and demonstrate your academic integrity.

9. Revise and proofread: Once you have written your assignment, take the time to revise and proofread it. Check for clarity, coherence, grammar, and spelling errors. Ensure that your arguments are supported by evidence and that your analysis is logical.

Remember, this assignment requires critical thinking and evidence-based arguments, so take your time to conduct thorough research and analyze the information you find. Good luck!