Friday
July 25, 2014

Homework Help: STATISTICS

Posted by Susie on Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 3:50pm.

A study was conducted to examine the peer review process. The investigators hypothesized that reviewers suggested by authors would give more favorable reviews than reviewers picked by journal editors. They obtained data on 40 manuscripts that had been reviewed by 1 author-suggested and 1 editor-suggested reviewer. They obtained the following results:

Author-suggested reviewer
Editor-suggested reviewer Favorable (accept/revise) Unfavorable (reject)
Favorable (accept/revise) 10 1
Unfavorable (reject) 9 20
Calculate the exact two-sided p-value associated with this outcome (calculate the exact binomial probability).

.021
.043
less than .0001
.51
.01

Answer this Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

peer review - what are some advantages for both the reviewer and writer of peer ...
english- please revised - What feedback did you receive from the CWE, your peer ...
grammar - In the following sentence select the compound predicate. We could ...
english - What are some advantages-for both the reviewer and writer-of peer ...
Help - How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer? A peer reviewer ...
COM 220 - what is the benefits of receiving a peer review? what benefit does the...
statistics - 7. A researcher hypothesized that the greater number of hours ...
PEER REVIEW - What is the purpose of revising and editing an academic paper. 2. ...
Peer Review Article - I'm looking for 2 articles in Biology and I can't ...
psychology - Hello, can you lead me to how I would search for peer reviewed ...

Search
Members