Posted by **Susie** on Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 3:44pm.

In a cross-sectional study of heart disease and gender in middle-aged men and women, 10% of men in the sample had prevalent heart disease compared with only 5% of women in the sample. After adjusting for age in multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio for heart disease comparing males to females was 1.1 (95% confidence interval: 0.79—1.43). What conclusions can you draw?

A) Being male increases your risk of heart disease.

B) Age is a confounder of the relationship between gender and heart disease.

C) The men in the study are younger than the women in the study.

D) There is a statistically significant association between gender and heart disease.

E) The study had insufficient power to detect an effect

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- Statistics - The mean serum cholesterol level in the population of males who do ...
- college psychology - Which of the following is FALSE? -Chinese American infants ...
- Statistics - A recent study was designed to compare smoking habits of young ...
- math - A study conducted an experiment with 22,000 women over 10 years to ...
- statistics - To find out what people think, the Gallup Poll selected a random ...
- Statistics - A random sample of 250 men yielded 175 who said they'd ridden a ...
- statistics - A random sample of 250 men yielded 175 who said they'd ridden a ...
- STATISTICS - Length of Hospital Stays: The average length of “short” hospital ...
- Health - Which of the following is FALSE? -Chinese American infants have the ...
- psychology - The biosocial approach suggests that gender differences are based ...

More Related Questions