Frenda et al. (2013, p. 285) stated "first, because Slate gathered little information about its participants other than political ideology, it may be that variables confounded with ideology—and not ideology per se—were responsible for the differences we observed between conservatives and liberals."
Note two other potential confounds in this study and explain
confounds:
little information about its participants
political ideology
variables confounds
conservatives and liberals
Others: who participated? was it random or groups that wanted to change the outcomes?
what was the size of the sample?
exactly what information was gathered?
Was that information valid?
Exactly what differences we observed means?
can you explain in more depth
What are your answers to Bobpursley's questions?
thats already a variable in the question which said not to use
To identify potential confounds in the study conducted by Frenda et al. (2013), we need to consider factors that could be related to the observed differences between conservatives and liberals, other than their political ideology. Here are two potential confounds that should be taken into account:
1. Socioeconomic status (SES): One potential confound in this study could be the participants' socioeconomic status. If the conservatives and liberals in the study differed significantly in their socioeconomic background, this could have influenced the observed differences. For example, individuals from higher socioeconomic backgrounds might hold different values or have access to different resources, which could impact their responses in the study. To assess and rule out SES as a potential confound, researchers could collect information about participants' education level, occupation, and income.
2. Ethnicity or cultural background: Another potential confound could be the ethnic or cultural background of the participants. Different ethnic or cultural groups may have distinct political ideologies, as well as different levels of exposure to certain societal influences. For instance, conservatives and liberals from different ethnic backgrounds might be influenced by cultural values or historical experiences unique to their group. To address this confound, researchers could collect information about the participants' ethnic or cultural background, which would allow for a more nuanced analysis of the observed differences between conservatives and liberals.
It is important to note that these are just two potential confounds, and there might be other variables that could have influenced the differences between conservatives and liberals. Identifying and controlling for potential confounds is essential for obtaining more accurate and reliable results in studies involving different groups with potentially diverse characteristics.