Describe three potential extraneous variables in your experiment on whether prayer causes healing

Please only post your questions once. Repeating posts will not get a quicker response. In addition, it wastes our time looking over reposts that have already been answered in another post. Thank you.

You need to describe your independent and dependent variables more specifically before you can identify extraneous variables.

When conducting an experiment on whether prayer causes healing, it is essential to identify and control potential extraneous variables that could influence the results. Here are three examples of such variables:

1. Placebo effect: The placebo effect refers to the phenomenon where the belief in receiving treatment or intervention influences a person's physiological or psychological condition. In the context of prayer and healing, participants who believe in the healing power of prayer might experience improvements due to the placebo effect rather than the actual impact of prayer alone. To control for this, a suitable control group receiving a placebo intervention should be included in the experiment, such as sham prayer or another non-therapeutic activity that resembles prayer.

2. Personal belief and faith: Participants' personal beliefs and faith play a significant role in their expectations and experiences of healing. If they have strong faith in prayer, they may attribute any positive changes to prayer, regardless of its actual effectiveness. Conversely, participants who are skeptical of prayer's efficacy may experience no healing effects, even if prayer has a potential impact. To address this, it is crucial to consider participants' beliefs and attitudes towards prayer by thoroughly screening and assigning them to appropriate groups or analyzing their influence as a potential moderating variable.

3. Social support and interactions: The experience of healing can be influenced by social factors, including emotional support and interactions with others during the prayer process. People who receive prayer might experience psychological benefits and improved well-being primarily due to the feeling of being cared for or supported by others. To mitigate this potential confounding variable, it is important to account for the level of social support received by both the experimental and control groups. This can be done by establishing consistent levels of emotional support in the control group by using trained individuals who provide empathetic attention without praying.

Remember, these are just three examples of possible extraneous variables, and there might be more specific to your experiment. It's crucial to consider and control as many potential confounding factors as possible to ensure that the observed effects can be attributed to prayer's efficacy or lack thereof in the context of healing.