Different ethical theories (Points : 1)

can never offer useful information.
must always contradict each other.
can agree that certain acts are morally justified.
always agree that certain acts are morally justified.

Scratch off the "always" and "never" thoughts, and what's left?

Different ethical theories can agree that certain acts are morally justified. Ethical theories are frameworks that attempt to provide guidance on how to determine what is morally right or wrong. While different theories may have various principles and approaches, they can still reach similar conclusions about certain actions being morally justified.

To understand which acts are morally justified, it is necessary to study and compare different ethical theories. Some commonly discussed ethical theories include utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and ethical relativism. Each theory offers a unique perspective on how to evaluate moral decisions and considers different factors such as consequences, duties, virtues, or cultural norms.

For example, a utilitarian might argue that an action is morally justified if it maximizes overall happiness or minimizes suffering for the greatest number of people. On the other hand, a deontologist might focus on the inherent principles or duties guiding the action, rather than the consequences. Meanwhile, a virtue ethicist might emphasize the development of moral virtues and character traits.

Although these theories have different foundations and sometimes conflicting viewpoints, they can still agree on certain acts being morally justified. For instance, both utilitarianism and deontology can agree that helping others or telling the truth in certain situations is morally justified. While the reasons behind their agreements may differ, there can be common ground despite their diverging positions.

Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that different ethical theories never offer useful information, must always contradict each other, or always agree on certain acts being morally justified. They can provide valuable insights and perspectives, and there can be overlaps in their conclusions regarding moral justifications.