Trying to understand these two correlations using the Pearson r.
How do i interrupt the relationships
1)Just World and Locus of control
r=-.224
p-value=.210 (Sig. 2-tailed)
2)Just world and Authoritarianism
r=.329
p-value=.062
3)Locus of Control and Authoritarianism
r=-.203
p-value=.258
Actually three correlations...
Here are a few hints:
The Pearson r is the correlation coefficient and is a measure of correlation, which can be positive or negative. The closer the correlation is to 0, the weaker it is. The closer to +1 or -1, the stronger it is. If you have a correlation of +1 or -1, then this is considered a perfect positive or negative correlation.
You have two negative (-) correlations and one positive (+) correlation. With negative correlations, when one variable goes up (increases), the other goes down (decreases). With positive correlations, the variables go up or down together.
I hope this helps.
To interpret the relationships between variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), we consider both the value of r and the corresponding p-value.
1) Just World and Locus of Control:
The correlation coefficient (r) for Just World and Locus of Control is -0.224. The negative sign indicates a negative relationship, suggesting that as scores on Just World increase, scores on Locus of Control tend to decrease. However, the absolute value of r suggests that the relationship is weak.
The p-value of 0.210 (Sig. 2-tailed) indicates that the result is not statistically significant. Typically, we compare the p-value to a predetermined significance level (e.g., 0.05) to determine if we can reject the null hypothesis. In this case, since the p-value is higher than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support a significant correlation between Just World and Locus of Control.
2) Just World and Authoritarianism:
The correlation coefficient (r) for Just World and Authoritarianism is 0.329. The positive sign indicates a positive relationship, suggesting that as scores on Just World increase, scores on Authoritarianism tend to increase as well. The absolute value of r suggests a moderate relationship.
The p-value of 0.062 is close to the predetermined significance level. In this case, we would fail to reject the null hypothesis, but the result is relatively borderline. It implies that there might be a possibility of a significant correlation between Just World and Authoritarianism, but more evidence is needed to draw a definitive conclusion.
3) Locus of Control and Authoritarianism:
The correlation coefficient (r) for Locus of Control and Authoritarianism is -0.203. The negative sign indicates a negative relationship, suggesting that as scores on Locus of Control increase, scores on Authoritarianism tend to decrease. However, the absolute value of r suggests a weak relationship.
The p-value of 0.258 is higher than the significance level, indicating that there is not enough evidence to support a significant correlation between Locus of Control and Authoritarianism.
In summary, based on the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and the p-values, 1) there is not a significant correlation between Just World and Locus of Control, 2) there might be a potential correlation between Just World and Authoritarianism, and 3) there is no significant correlation between Locus of Control and Authoritarianism. However, keep in mind that the p-values are close to the significance level in some cases, indicating the need for further investigation or replication of the study.