According to Robert Nozick, the state is justified to tax a citizen (even against his or her will) if:

a) the revenues support things like healthcare and education, which improve the life-prospects of all citizens.
b) all citizens are required to pay the same percentage of their income.
c) the majority enacts the taxation.
d) doing so leads to the greatest happiness of society as a whole.
e) the taxes are used to support nothing more than a minimal state.

Your repetitive, answer-mooching posts have been removed. Apparently, you learned nothing yesterday.

~~>No one will do your work for you, but someone here will be happy to check what YOU THINK the answers are.

Do not answer these questions. They are for exams which this guy is trying to get answers out of.

shame on you idiot, these are the questions from the online Harvard University Course "justice"

some people will never learn.

According to Robert Nozick, the specific condition that justifies the state to tax a citizen (even against their will) is option e) when the taxes are used to support nothing more than a minimal state. Nozick argues for a minimal state, which only performs the essential functions of protecting individuals' rights and enforcing contracts. In his book "Anarchy, State, and Utopia," Nozick asserts that any taxation beyond the funding of a minimal state would infringe upon individual rights.

To arrive at this answer, we can examine Nozick's theory of minimal state and understand his arguments. Nozick believes in a libertarian philosophy that emphasizes the primary importance of individual rights, including property rights. He argues that individuals are entitled to the fruits of their labor and have a right to keep what they have legitimately acquired.

Nozick contends that taxation beyond what is necessary for a minimal state would violate individuals' rights by forcibly confiscating their property. He argues that individuals have the right to decide how to use their resources and distribute them voluntarily. Imposing taxes for purposes other than a minimal state, such as redistributing wealth or providing public goods and services beyond basic protection, would be a violation of these rights.

Therefore, according to Nozick, taxation is only justified when it is used to sustain a minimal state that protects individuals' rights and enforces contracts.