Pretend you are a modern social worker, educator, environmentalist, or military advisor to the president. Attack an evil you see the work by writing an ironic proposal and the proposal have to be outrageous

Please note that no one here will do your work for you. However, we will be happy to read over what YOU THINK and make suggestions and/or corrections.


Please post what you think.

I don't understand the question please explain

1. Choose ONE of the types of people listed.

2. Think of a major problem that person could become aware of in his/her life or work.

3. Then think of a way to address that problem in an ironic way (ironic = something the opposite of what's expected).

4. Make sure your solution to the problem is not only ironic, but also outrageous.

http://www.answers.com/ironic

http://www.answers.com/outrageous

Thank you

Title: The Outlandish Proposal to Combat Environmental Destruction

Introduction:
As a modern environmentalist, it is my solemn duty to propose an absolutely preposterous yet ironic solution to the impending doom of our fragile planet. With tongue firmly in cheek, I present a ludicrous plan that seeks to address the root of all evil we face in environmental degradation. Brace yourselves, for this proposal will undoubtedly challenge your belief in logic and practicality.

Proposal:

1. The Absurd Emission Trading Initiative:
To combat the devastating impact of greenhouse gas emissions and promote environmental conservation, we propose launching a ludicrous scheme called "Emission Illicit Trading System" (EITS). Under this proposal, every individual or corporation would be allocated emission credits based on their historic carbon footprint. However, instead of promoting reduction, the scheme would encourage reckless industrial activity.

2. The Dumpster Piggy Bank Project:
To address the excessive waste generation problem, we suggest embracing an outrageous incentive program called the "Dumpster Piggy Bank Project." This initiative would reward individuals or companies for generating more waste, promoting an unprecedented culture of hoarding and wastefulness.

3. The Invasive Species Wrestling League:
To protect our biodiversity, we propose establishing an utterly bizarre annual competition called the "Invasive Species Wrestling League." This league would invite participants to import, breed, and release invasive species into the wild, and then engage in humorous televised battles against the invasive creatures. The more exotic the invader and the more absurd the wrestling match, the greater the audience draw!

4. Project Delusional Recycling:
To tackle the recycling crisis, we need to channel our inner absurdity. Therefore, we propose the "Project Delusional Recycling," which involves a fantastical system where individuals are allowed to throw all types of waste into a single bin, creating a chaotic yet awe-inspiring mix. This way, recycling facilities will have the opportunity to engage their staff in unending puzzles of sorting and reassembling items, ensuring job security and endless entertainment.

Conclusion:
While this proposal may seem preposterous and even offensive to the very values we hold dear, its intention is not to be taken seriously. Rather, it aims to provoke thought and emphasize the importance of rational and practical approaches. By contrasting these outrageous ideas with the real solutions, we can better understand the genuine magnitude of the challenges we face, inspiring us to take meaningful action to address them.