Posted by **alexis** on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 at 5:08pm.

More than a decade ago, high levels of lead in the blood put 88% of children at risk. A concerted effort was made to remove lead from the environment. Now, suppose only 12% of children in the United States are at risk of high blood-lead levels.

(a) In a random sample of 194 children taken more than a decade ago, what is the probability that 50 or more had high blood-lead levels? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

- Stats -
**Steph**, Sunday, April 28, 2013 at 10:32pm
n=194

P(r >/= 50)

p= .12 (converted percent to decimal)

q= 1-p = 1-.12 = .88

P(x) = r-.5 if r is to the left(greater than) therefore,

P(x>/= 49.5)

You need P(z>/= ?)

So:

mean (mu) = np = (194)(.12) = 23.28

stan. dev. (sigma) = sqrt(npq) = (194)(.12)(.88) = 4.526

z= (x - mu)/sigma = (49.5 - 23.28)/4.526 = 5.79

So: P(z >/= 5.79), now you look up the probability on your z-chart and there's your answer.

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- Statistics - Suppose that more than a decade ago high levels of lead in the ...
- Statistic - In the following problem, check that it is appropriate to use the ...
- statistics - In the following problem, check that it is appropriate to use the ...
- math - Lead Contamination More than a decade ago high levels of lead in the ...
- Statistics - In the following problem, check that it is appropriate to use the ...
- Public Health - All of the following are true of lead as an environmental hazard...
- English - 1. We will lead your children to the joys of reading. 2. We will lead ...
- Teaching in Early childhood progras - Why should teachers offer a variety of ...
- public health - what does it means to have high levels of lead in your blood
- math - The united ages of a man and his wife are six times to united ages of ...

More Related Questions