there is a man who decided to make a garden either in shape of rectangle or parallelogram in front of his house and fence it. but he chooses the rectangle shape. The parallelogram whose length is 20m and width is 14m. The cost of fencing is Rs.2000 per metre.

a) What was the cost incurred by him?
b) Why did he choose a rectangle and not a parallelogram? Which perimeter would have been more-a rectangle or a parallelogram?
(iii) What value of the man is shown here?

a) To find the cost incurred by the man, we need to calculate the perimeter of the rectangle and multiply it by the cost of fencing per meter.

The perimeter of a rectangle is calculated by adding the lengths of all four sides together. In this case, the length of the rectangle is not given, so we cannot determine its exact perimeter.

b) The man decided to choose a rectangle over a parallelogram. The reason behind this decision could be personal preference, simplicity, or convenience.

To determine which shape has a greater perimeter, we need to calculate the perimeter of both shapes.

For the rectangle, we need the length, which is not provided. Therefore, we cannot compare the perimeters of the rectangle and parallelogram.

(iii) From the given information, we cannot determine the specific value or moral demonstrated by the man.