We anticipate the evidence gathered by you will indicate that
three of the five species are in greater need of prioritising for conservation
compared with the other two. You should start your account by very briefly
explaining why these two species were considered to be of lower priority.
Thereafter your account need only refer to evidence for the three remaining
species and should include an explanation of how you made your final
choice of the one species to prioritise for conservation action. In your
answer you should consider the combination of the factors researched in the
group, namely the phylogenetic importance of each of the three
species and the primate families to which they belong, their geographical
range and habitat, any current specific or non-specific threats each species is
facing and their current International Union for Conservation of Nature
(IUCN) Red List status.
For your answer to this question it is important that you cite and
reference the sources of any information you use to help you come to your
decision about conservation action. You should write in your own words but
if you need to quote directly from a source, this should be brief and made
clear by quotation marks as well as a citation following the quote.
Make sure you understand the difference between giving a list of your
references at the end of your account and citing a reference within the text
of your account. Only the name(s) of the authors and year of publication are
given in the actual account, either immediately after the information as:
(Author, year) or before it in the form:
Author(s) (year) state(s) that …
The full references are given at the end of the account.
can any one explain this question to me what do i have to write i want to understand .thanks
sorry i forgot to give the name of the species .
family lemuridae- species Eulemur coronatus
First briefly show why the two are not threatened to the point of Red listing.
Then, show in detail why the three species in the most danger need to go on the Red list.
The question is asking you to analyze and prioritize five different species for conservation actions. Three of these species are considered to be in greater need of prioritization compared to the remaining two species.
You should begin by briefly explaining why the two species were considered to be of lower priority. This could include factors such as their phylogenetic importance, the primate families they belong to, their geographical range and habitat, any specific or non-specific threats they are facing, and their current IUCN Red List status.
Once you've explained the reasons for the lower priority of the two species, you should focus your account on the evidence for the three remaining species. Consider the same factors mentioned above (phylogenetic importance, primate families, geographical range and habitat, threats, and IUCN Red List status) for each of the three species.
Based on this evidence, you need to select one species that should be prioritized for conservation action. In your answer, explain how you reached this decision by considering the combination of the researched factors for each species.
When writing your answer, remember to cite and reference the sources of any information you use to support your decision. You can either cite the name(s) of the author(s) and the year of publication immediately after the information, or before it in the form "Author(s) (year) state(s) that...".
At the end of your account, include a list of full references for all the sources you cited throughout your answer.
Now you can begin your analysis of the species, considering the factors mentioned, and come to a conclusion about which species should be prioritized for conservation action.