philosophers suggest arguments should be won by?

a. the best argument
b. a coin flip
c.the person who feels most strongly about the issue
d. vilence

What do you think?

violence

Philosophers generally suggest that arguments should be won by the best argument, which means that the position with the most logical reasoning, evidence, and support should prevail. This approach is often associated with the principle of rationality, where sound reasoning and evidence are seen as the most effective way to reach valid conclusions and make justified decisions.

To determine the best argument, it is important to consider several factors:

1. Logical consistency: The argument should have a clear and coherent structure, with the premises leading logically to the conclusion.

2. Empirical evidence: Arguments should be supported by reliable and relevant evidence from observation or experimentation. Facts, data, and scientific studies can enhance the strength of an argument.

3. Avoidance of fallacies: Arguments should avoid common logical fallacies like ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, or appeals to emotion. These fallacies can undermine the strength and validity of the argument.

4. Counterarguments: A strong argument should anticipate and address potential counterarguments, demonstrating the ability to engage with opposing viewpoints and provide rebuttals.

While personal conviction or emotional attachment to an issue can play a role in motivating individuals to participate in debates, philosophers generally emphasize that it is the quality of the arguments presented that should ultimately determine the winner. It is essential to engage in rational discourse and critically evaluate different perspectives to arrive at well-informed and justified conclusions, rather than resorting to random chance (coin flip) or violence.