Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 10:22pm.
The first party who is to file the statement has the priority to the collateral. The person signing over the papers and giving the bank permission to take the collateral has every right to calm the property that was disclosed in the financing statement. Agile borrowed five hundred thousand dollars from the Metro Bank and signed the dis-closer and settled the amount with interest. Along with the dis-closer was a written note explaining the collateral and what they could take if the loan is not paid in full in a timely fashion. Since Agile did not pay the loan in full at the time it was to be paid, the Metro Bank took the collateral. The collateral's were made up of the person getting the loan’s inventory and proceeds. The HFC would get first choice of the property, inventory and proceeds because they are the first priority of the loan. Then the bank will get the rest of what is left over due to them being a second party in the loan process. If Agile did not want the collateral to be taken than he should have paid in full the loan and got it over with.
Related Questions
business law - You are the chief executive officer of Money Games Inc.(MGI), ...
Business - You are the chief executive officer of Money Games Inc.(MGI), which ...
Managerial finance - Larissa has also provided the following information. During...
finance - 1. Baldwin Products Company anticipates reaching a sales level of $6 ...
Finance - United Technology Corporation (UTC) has $40 million of convertible ...
finance (please review my thought process and ans) - 4. A conservative financing...
Finance - The Arizona Bay Corporation sells on credit terms o net 30. Its ...
Finance - Landis Corporation The Landis Corporation had 2008 sales of $100 ...
finance and cost management - house corporation makes credit sales of 2160 000 ...
Finance ( PLEASE HELP) - You have been assigned the task of using the corparate...
For Further Reading