Sunday
March 26, 2017

Post a New Question

Posted by on .

In Reno v. Condon, Attorney General of South Carolina, the case in the book addressing
whether Congress could prohibit states from selling personal information of citizens
without consent, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
a. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the First Amendment.
b. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.
c. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.
d. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Regulatory Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
e. The Driver’s Privacy Protection Act was not a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.

Answer This Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question