Tuesday
May 5, 2015

Homework Help: Buisness Law

Posted by KATHY on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 2:43pm.

In Reno v. Condon, Attorney General of South Carolina, the case in the book addressing
whether Congress could prohibit states from selling personal information of citizens
without consent, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
a. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the First Amendment.
b. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.
c. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.
d. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Regulatory Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
e. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was not a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.

Answer this Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

Members