Saturday
March 28, 2015

Homework Help: Buisness Law

Posted by KATHY on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 2:43pm.

In Reno v. Condon, Attorney General of South Carolina, the case in the book addressing
whether Congress could prohibit states from selling personal information of citizens
without consent, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
a. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the First Amendment.
b. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.
c. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.
d. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Regulatory Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
e. The Driverís Privacy Protection Act was not a proper exercise of the authority of Congress
to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause.

Answer this Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

college- law - Question about the Loving vs. Virginia case. When the Lovings ...
History - Could someone explain the concept of judicial review and its impact on...
U.S.History - couldn't find the answr to this one in my book: Under popular ...
Social Studies! CHECK! - 1. which event proved to European leaders that the ...
Government - Which case would the the U.S. Supreme Court most likely agree to ...
law - A woman in one state is suing a woman in another state for $25,000. Which ...
Political Sciences - Consider the follow scenario: You are a criminal defense ...
check - The "Era of good feelings", was noted for the: exceptioanlly strong ...
Constitution... multiple choice - Please help me because I cannot find any of ...
Political Science-PLEASE HELP - Consider the following scenario: You are a ...

Members