does this sound right with grammatical errors too

Odysseus sent three men to see what the land of the Lotus Eaters, who live on the flower, is about. The three men had gotten fed the Lotus and now they had no desire to go back to the ship or go back home. That is why Odysseus had to get them and then we sailed off. I saw that Odysseus will not let us loose our determination to sailing back home.

Odysseus sent three men to see what the land [possible capitalization of L here] of the Lotus Eaters, who LIVED on the flower, WAS [watch your tenses] about. The three men had gotten fed the Lotus and now they had no desire to go back to the ship or TO go back home. That is why Odysseus had to get them*.* [I would separate this into two sentences] *Then,* we sailed off. I saw that Odysseus WOULD not let us LOSE (loose vs lose. look up the definitions of these two VERY DIFFERENT words] our determination to sailing back home.

thanks a ton

The given paragraph contains some grammatical errors. Here's the corrected version:

"Odysseus sent three men to see what the land of the Lotus Eaters, who live on the flower, was about. The three men had been fed the Lotus and now they had no desire to go back to the ship or return home. That is why Odysseus had to retrieve them, and then we sailed off. I saw that Odysseus would not let us lose our determination to sail back home."

To identify the grammatical errors, it is important to have a good understanding of grammar rules and pay attention to verb tenses, verb agreement, and word choices. In this case, correcting the verb tenses (using "was" instead of "is") and verb agreement (using "had been fed" instead of "had gotten fed") helped in rectifying the errors. Additionally, ensuring the correct use of verb forms ("lose" instead of "loose"), pronouns ("our" instead of "us"), and consistent tense usage ("would" instead of "will") helps to improve the overall clarity and accuracy of the paragraph.