Is the steel industry that Carnegie controlled made him a a robber baron or no what made him a robber baron is that he succeed which included exploiting workers and others.
He was a robber baron because he used unethical tactics to defeat his steel company competitors and exploited his workers. In other words, he stole from both other companies and his employees.
I was partciality right just forgot one more detail
Thank You Ms. Sue! :)
Now I understand
btw -- when do you mean he stole from his "employees"
and as for other companies you mean ideas right?
also what does unethical tactics means???
Carnegie also charged his customers less than his costs so that they would buy from him rather than from his competitors.
He stole from his employees by underpaying and overworking them.
ok
thanks! :)
You're welcome.
To determine whether Andrew Carnegie, who controlled the steel industry, can be considered a robber baron, we need to understand the definition of a robber baron and assess if Carnegie's actions align with it.
1. Definition of a Robber Baron: A robber baron refers to a 19th-century business tycoon who amassed great wealth through unfair and exploitative practices, often at the expense of workers and competitors.
2. Carnegie's Control of the Steel Industry: Andrew Carnegie was a prominent figure in the American steel industry during the late 19th century. He founded the Carnegie Steel Company, which grew to be one of the largest and most profitable corporations in the world.
3. Exploitation of Workers: Carnegie's success in the steel industry was accompanied by criticisms of worker exploitation. He implemented cost-cutting measures, such as reducing wages and lengthening work hours, which led to poor working conditions for his employees. These practices were common during the time, as the Industrial Revolution brought fierce competition and a drive for lower costs.
4. Exploitation of Others: While Carnegie's success can be attributed to strategic business decisions, some argue that he engaged in questionable practices to gain an advantage over competitors. For example, he utilized vertical integration, which involved controlling every aspect of production, from mining raw materials to transport and distribution. This practice allowed him to undercut competitors and control prices.
Considering these factors, it can be argued that Carnegie fits the description of a robber baron to some extent. His success in the steel industry involved exploiting workers through low wages and poor conditions, which was a common practice of the time. Additionally, his aggressive business tactics, like vertical integration, allowed him to dominate the industry and potentially harm competitors.
However, it's important to note that the term "robber baron" can be subjective and differs depending on personal perspectives and historical context. Some may argue that Carnegie's philanthropic efforts, like his establishment of libraries and universities, mitigates his exploitative practices. Ultimately, the status of Carnegie as a robber baron is a matter of interpretation and individual judgment.