In "Some Moral Minima," Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. Do you think Goodman is right? Using specific examples, explore the challenges Goodman presents to relativism. Determine whether you think there are such universal moral requirements, and defend your answer in a well-argued three-page paper

How would you like us to help you with this assignment?

I need help answering a quiz question; How can the Sociological Perspective help you in understanding the plight or condition of members in society who come from marginalized such as women

To determine whether Lenn Goodman is right in his argument about the existence of universal moral requirements, it is important to critically analyze his points and the challenges he presents to relativism. By doing so, you can form an informed opinion and construct a well-argued three-page paper.

To begin, you should read Goodman's article, "Some Moral Minima," in order to understand his arguments and the examples he provides. Take note of his main points and the specific examples he uses to support his claims. Look for any logical reasoning or evidence he presents to challenge relativism.

Once you have a clear understanding of Goodman's arguments, you can start examining the challenges he poses to relativism. Relativism is the belief that moral values and principles vary from person to person or culture to culture. Goodman, however, argues that there are certain actions that are universally wrong, regardless of cultural or individual differences.

One of the challenges he presents to relativism is the fact that different cultures and individuals may have conflicting moral values. For example, in some cultures, female genital mutilation is considered a normal and acceptable practice, while in others, it is seen as a violation of human rights. Goodman argues that from a universal perspective, acts like female genital mutilation can be deemed morally wrong due to the harm and suffering they cause.

Another challenge Goodman raises is that certain actions violate fundamental human rights. For instance, genocide, terrorism, and slavery are widely condemned as immoral and unjust practices. By appealing to these extreme examples, Goodman asserts that there are universal moral requirements that transcend cultural relativism.

To evaluate Goodman's argument and form your own opinion, it is important to consider counterarguments as well. Relativists may argue that morality is subjective and dependent on cultural norms, personal beliefs, and individual experiences. They may also contend that the notion of universal moral requirements is culturally biased and ethnocentric.

To defend your stance in a well-argued three-page paper, you should present a clear thesis statement that outlines your opinion on whether there are universal moral requirements, based on your analysis of Goodman's arguments. Then, organize your paper into sections, each addressing a different aspect of the issue.

In each section, provide evidence and examples from Goodman's work to support your arguments. Analyze and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of his points, and address any counterarguments or alternative perspectives. It is crucial to use logical reasoning and critical thinking throughout the paper, presenting a balanced and well-informed viewpoint.

In addition to Goodman's arguments and the challenges he presents to relativism, consider incorporating other scholarly sources that provide different perspectives on the topic. This will help strengthen your arguments and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject matter.

In conclusion, to write a well-argued three-page paper on whether there are universal moral requirements, carefully analyze Lenn Goodman's arguments and the challenges he presents to relativism. Consider counterarguments and alternative perspectives, and construct a well-structured paper that defends your stance using logical reasoning and evidence from relevant sources.