Identify, specifically, the ethical issue and the ethical problems it presents. Drawing on various sources, explain how one of the classical theories (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) would resolve the problem. Then, contrast this response with the perspective brought to the issue by relativism, emotivism, or ethical egoism. Finally, state which of these views is closer to your own, supporting your response with a clearly-presented and well-supported argument. The more specific you can be the better, and feel free to include examples that will strengthen your account.

How would you like us to help you with this assignment?

My topic to this draft is Stem Cell, I have a hard time doing an outline, or a draft. Need help.

Brainstorm your answers to these questions:

*Identify, specifically, the ethical issue and the ethical problems it presents.
*Drawing on various sources, explain how one of the classical theories (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) would resolve the problem.
* Then, contrast this response with the perspective brought to the issue by relativism, emotivism, or ethical egoism.

This gives you three points in your outline.

The ethical issue that will be analyzed in this response is a hypothetical scenario involving the development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for autonomous weapons. This issue raises several ethical problems, including the potential for indiscriminate harm, the lack of human oversight, and the erosion of accountability.

Utilitarianism, a classical ethical theory, focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people. From a utilitarian perspective, the development and deployment of autonomous weapons could be evaluated based on its consequences. Utilitarians would weigh the potential benefits of using AI systems for warfare, such as minimizing casualties on one's own side or reducing civilian casualties, against the potential harms. If the benefits outweigh the harms, utilitarianism would support the development and use of these weapons.

Deontology, another classical ethical theory, emphasizes adherence to moral duties and principles. From a deontological perspective, the use of autonomous weapons raises concerns about the violation of human rights and the principle of respect for human dignity. Deontologists argue that it would be ethically wrong to use AI in warfare, as it goes against fundamental principles of humanity and the intrinsic value of human life.

Virtue ethics focuses on developing virtuous character traits and promoting the flourishing of individuals and communities. From a virtue ethics standpoint, the development and use of autonomous weapons may damage the moral character of individuals involved in their creation and deployment. Virtue ethicists would argue that it is essential to avoid compromising our moral virtues, such as compassion and responsibility, by refraining from using AI systems in warfare.

In contrast, relativism posits that ethical judgments are subjective and vary based on individual or cultural perspectives. Relativism allows for a range of viewpoints and does not prescribe a specific resolution to the ethical problem of autonomous weapons. Different individuals or cultures may have their own moral judgments, which may lead to differing conclusions regarding whether autonomous weapons are ethically acceptable.

Emotivism, as a metaethical theory, suggests that ethical judgments are rooted in emotional expressions rather than logical or rational considerations. Emotivism does not provide a clear resolution to the ethical issue of autonomous weapons since it focuses on expressing personal emotional attitudes rather than providing ethical guidance.

Ethical egoism asserts that individuals should act in their own self-interest, promoting their own well-being. From an ethical egoist perspective, one would evaluate the development and use of autonomous weapons based on personal advantages and interests. If an individual believes that deploying AI systems in warfare would serve their self-interest, they may support it, regardless of potential negative consequences.

Considering my own perspective, I align closer to the deontological approach in evaluating this issue. I believe that the use of autonomous weapons disregards the inherent value and dignity of human life. The potential for indiscriminate harm and the erosion of accountability outweigh any potential benefits. Moreover, the development and deployment of autonomous weapons risk dehumanizing warfare and desensitizing society to the consequences of violence. By prioritizing the principle of respect for human dignity, the deontological approach provides a stronger moral stance against the use of AI systems for warfare.