Dejure discrimination and defacto discrimination are two ways in which some americans are less equal than others. Examples of public policies designed to address each of these forms of discrimination are: A.Brown decision (dejure) and affirmative action(defacto).B.Affirmative action dejure) and the voting rights act of 1965 (defacto). C.The voting rights act of 1965(dejure)and the Brown decision(Defacto). D.The supreme court's busing(dejure) and affirmative action decisions (defacto).

i think its c

I'll be glad to check your answer.

http://www.answers.com/topic/de-facto-and-de-jure-segregation

I disagree.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education

i think it D i hope im confused.

It's A.

The Brown Decision was dejure because because it declared Kansas's school segregation law unconstitutional. Affirmative action was defacto because it was common practice, but it wasn't the law.

To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the definitions of dejure discrimination and defacto discrimination.

Dejure discrimination refers to discrimination that is enforced by law or through formal governmental policies. This means that there are explicit laws or regulations in place that specifically discriminate against certain groups of people.

Defacto discrimination, on the other hand, refers to discrimination that occurs in practice, even if there are no explicit laws or policies in place. It is a result of societal norms, prejudices, and practices that disadvantage certain groups of people without legal enforcement.

Now, let's analyze each option:

A. Brown decision (dejure) and affirmative action (defacto): The Brown decision by the Supreme Court in 1954 ruled that racially segregated public schools were unconstitutional, making it an example of dejure discrimination. Affirmative action, on the other hand, aims to address historical imbalances and promote equal opportunities for underrepresented groups. It is a policy response to defacto discrimination. So, this answer is partially correct as the Brown decision falls under dejure discrimination, but affirmative action is not defacto discrimination, making it incorrect.

B. Affirmative action (dejure) and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (defacto): Affirmative action, as mentioned before, is not a form of dejure discrimination. However, it is considered a policy response to defacto discrimination. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was specifically designed to combat voter discrimination, which is a form of dejure discrimination. So, this option is incorrect as affirmative action is not dejure discrimination.

C. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 (dejure) and the Brown decision (defacto): The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is an example of dejure discrimination as it aims to address discriminatory voting practices. The Brown decision, as previously mentioned, is an example of dejure discrimination as well. Therefore, this option is correct as it correctly matches policies to their respective forms of discrimination.

D. The Supreme Court's busing (dejure) and affirmative action decisions (defacto): The Supreme Court's busing decisions were meant to address racial segregation in schools, which is a form of dejure discrimination. Affirmative action, as discussed, is not defacto discrimination but rather a policy response to it. Therefore, this option is incorrect.

Based on the explanations above, the correct answer is: C. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 (dejure) and the Brown decision (defacto).