Which of the following is NOT a reason for holding congressional investigations?

A) to focus public attention on an important issue
B) to oversee the executive branch and its operations
C) on executive order from the President
D) to gather information

i need help

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_congressional_hearing

I'll be glad to check your answer.

To gather information

The correct answer is C) on executive order from the President. Holding congressional investigations is not solely dependent on an executive order from the President. Instead, congressional investigations are typically conducted by the legislative branch to focus public attention on important issues, oversee the executive branch, gather information, and perform other necessary functions in line with their role as lawmakers.

To determine which of the given options is NOT a reason for holding congressional investigations, we must carefully consider each option:

A) to focus public attention on an important issue: Congressional investigations often serve the purpose of bringing attention to significant matters that may require public awareness and discussion.

B) to oversee the executive branch and its operations: One of the primary responsibilities of Congress is to conduct oversight on the executive branch to ensure its proper functioning and adherence to the law.

C) on executive order from the President: While congressional investigations may be initiated in response to executive actions, an executive order from the President alone cannot be considered a primary reason for holding such investigations. Therefore, we can eliminate option C.

D) to gather information: Congressional investigations commonly aim to gather information to address key issues, evaluate policy effectiveness, or inform potential legislative actions.

By the process of elimination, we can conclude that C) on executive order from the President is NOT a reason for holding congressional investigations.