Social Darwinists believed that

A) a large empire was the key to economic growth.
B) the best country would win any international competition.
C) each nation should be made up of only one ethnic group.
D) military might was the most important measure of a nation.

why is that? because i got C

What does your text say?

The countries who practiced "social darwinism" used it to form worldwide colony empires and justify their colonization. Thus, AFrica was divided up and colonized, as was the Asia, and South America.

Africa and parts of Asia were divided up without regard for the native ethnic groups. Many countries contained more than one ethnic group.

Social Darwinists believed that the best (i.e., smartest, strongest) people pervailed.

The majority of the wealth of the Byzantine Empire was based on what I forgot?

To understand the beliefs of Social Darwinists, we need to examine the key tenets of Social Darwinism and how they apply to the given options.

Social Darwinism is a theory that emerged in the late 19th century, influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. It applied the principles of survival of the fittest and natural selection to the social and political realms. According to Social Darwinists, individuals, societies, and nations compete for survival and dominance, and only the strongest and most adapted would succeed.

Now let's review each option in light of the beliefs of Social Darwinists:

A) A large empire was the key to economic growth: Social Darwinists typically believed in the concept of imperialism and expansionism. They argued that nations with large empires had access to more resources, markets, and opportunities for economic growth, thus making them more likely to succeed in the global competition.

B) The best country would win any international competition: This option aligns with the core belief of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinists believed that competition among nations was inevitable and that only the strongest and most capable would emerge victorious in international affairs. They argued that nations should strive to be the best so that they could ensure their survival and dominance in the world.

C) Each nation should be made up of only one ethnic group: While some proponents of Social Darwinism may have held xenophobic or ethnocentric beliefs, the idea that each nation should be composed of only one ethnic group does not directly correlate with Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism primarily focused on competition and survival in a broader sense, rather than advocating for specific ethnic compositions.

D) Military might was the most important measure of a nation: This option is also in line with the beliefs of Social Darwinists. They often emphasized the importance of military strength as a measure of a nation's power and survival potential. They argued that strong military capabilities would ensure a nation's ability to protect itself, expand its empire, and compete effectively on the international stage.

Based on the above analysis, the most accurate answer is:

B) The best country would win any international competition.

To arrive at this answer, we needed to understand the key principles of Social Darwinism and evaluate each option in light of those principles.