5. The Ford Pinto case demonstrated that (Points : 1)

it was cost-effective in the long run to allow purchasers to die.
it was cost-effective in the short run to allow purchasers to die.
accountants should not be trusted.
the Pinto was Ford's best product.

I'll be glad to check your answer.

The correct answer is: it was cost-effective in the short run to allow purchasers to die.

To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the context of the Ford Pinto case. In the 1970s, Ford Motor Company introduced the Pinto, a compact car. However, it was later revealed that the design of the Pinto's fuel system made it susceptible to fires and explosions in rear-end collisions.

In the subsequent legal cases, it was discovered that Ford was aware of these design flaws before production but chose not to make necessary changes due to cost considerations. The company calculated that the cost of settling potential injury and death claims would be lower than the cost of recalls and redesigning the fuel system.

This decision led to a public outcry and numerous lawsuits, with critics arguing that Ford prioritized short-term financial savings over customer safety. The case became a prominent example of corporate negligence and ethical misconduct.

Therefore, the Ford Pinto case demonstrated that it was cost-effective in the short run for Ford to allow purchasers to die, as they made a calculated decision to prioritize profits over the safety of their customers.