Posted by Laruen on Sunday, June 10, 2012 at 9:08pm.
The Supreme Court didn't agree with you in the Dred Scott case. It said that a slave was property and couldn't be taken away from his owner.
http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/wwww/us/dredscottdecisiondef.htm
slave who forever changed the definition of property. He went with his master to Illinois and Minnesota and claimed that this made him a free man. The Missouri Supreme Court found otherwise. Scott, sued his new owner, John Sanford of New York, for damages, alleging physical abuse. A federal court ruled that Scott was a citizen. But the Supreme Court ruled otherwise. Chief Justice Roger Taney, in an 1857 plurality opinion, said that African-Americans could never become United States citizens and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Further, the Court said, Congress could not constitutionally exclude slavery from the territories.
So -- is your answer True or False?
well let's see....
The Supreme Court didn't agree .....
slave was property and couldn't be taken away from his owner....
true
hello??????
Yes. The answer is True.
thank you
You're welcome.
Related Questions
SS7R - HW Qs. Check (Q4) - Plantations, farms that used slaves to care for it&#...
SS7R - HW Qs. Check - TRUE OR FALSE When the settlers who favored slavery met ...
history- civil war - What did Abraham Lincoln mean by saying slaves represented...
SS7R - HW Qs. Check - Which geographic theme would be most concerned with ...
Social Studies 8R - HW. Qs. Check - Why did many freedmen and poor whites become...
SS7R - HW Qs. Check (Q2) - TRUE OR FALSE The North and South were always able to...
SS7R - HW Check - I'm going to repost my homework questions because now I&#...
Daily Roman LifePlease Help. - 1. Who could be a citizen of Rome? A) men B) ...
SS7R - HW Qs. Check (Q2) - The principle of ________________ _________________ ...
SS7R - HW Qs. Check (Q2) - who occupied the highest position in aztec society? ...
For Further Reading
