Discuss a case fro the NM court which has used a ruling involving the Tarasoff case
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=711&bih=453&noj=1&sclient=psy-ab&q=Tarasoff+case+New+Mexico&oq=Tarasoff+case+New+Mexico&aq=f&aqi=&aql=1&gs_l=serp.3...8378.15745.0.16055.16.16.0.0.0.0.135.1776.3j13.16.0.cqn%2Ccconf%3D0-95%2Cmin_length%3D2%2Crate_low%3D0-015%2Crate_high%3D0-015%2Csecond_pass%3Dfalse.1.0.0.11qIod-fn44
The Tarasoff case is a significant legal ruling that established the duty of mental health professionals to warn potential victims of their patients' violent intentions. Although the Tarasoff case originated in California, it has influenced court rulings throughout the United States, including New Mexico. To discuss a relevant case from the New Mexico court system that used a ruling involving the Tarasoff case, we need to consider a real-life example: the case of Levitt v. Southwest Gastroenterology Associates.
In the Levitt v. Southwest Gastroenterology Associates case in New Mexico, the principles established in the Tarasoff ruling were applied. The case involved a psychiatrist, Dr. Xavier, who treated a patient, Mr. Johnson, for a severe mental illness. During the course of treatment, Mr. Johnson expressed violent intentions towards his ex-girlfriend, Ms. Levitt. Dr. Xavier, following the Tarasoff ruling, had a duty to warn the potential victim about the threat.
When Dr. Xavier failed to inform Ms. Levitt about Mr. Johnson's violent intentions, she became the victim of an assault. Consequently, Ms. Levitt filed a lawsuit against Dr. Xavier and his affiliated medical practice, Southwest Gastroenterology Associates. The case went before the New Mexico court, and the ruling drew on precedents set by the Tarasoff case.
The court held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect potential victims when they are aware of a patient's specific and imminent threat of violence. In this case, Dr. Xavier breached his duty when he did not warn Ms. Levitt about Mr. Johnson's intentions, leading to her harm. The court found Southwest Gastroenterology Associates liable for the breach and ordered them to compensate Ms. Levitt for her damages.
This case from New Mexico demonstrates how the Tarasoff ruling has influenced court decisions in other jurisdictions. It reiterates the importance of mental health professionals recognizing their duty to take reasonable steps to protect potential victims from harm when they become aware of a serious threat made by their patients.