Napoleon claimed to be a freely elected leader.

a) What facts support his claim?

b) What facts do not? Explain

give me the effing answer

Please give me the answer

Wow after 10 years and your still trying to find the answer lmaoooo, I'm trying to find the exact answer for homework lol

a) Some facts that support Napoleon's claim of being a freely elected leader include the following:

1. Consulate and Emperorship: After the French Revolution, a new government called the Consulate was established, and Napoleon became the First Consul in 1799. In 1804, he declared himself Emperor. These positions were obtained through a series of legal and political maneuvers, including a referendum in 1804 where the majority of citizens voted in favor of making Napoleon Emperor.

2. Popular support: Napoleon enjoyed immense popularity among the French citizens due to his military victories and promises of stability and progress. He delivered on some of these promises, such as implementing the Napoleonic Code, which brought legal reforms and equality to France.

3. Plebiscites: Napoleon regularly conducted plebiscites, or direct votes by citizens, to legitimize his rule and policies. These plebiscites gave citizens the opportunity to express their support or reject his actions. While the results of these votes were often manipulated, they did provide some semblance of popular participation.

b) However, there are also facts that do not support Napoleon's claim of being a freely elected leader:

1. Manipulation of plebiscites: Although Napoleon conducted plebiscites, the outcomes were often predetermined or influenced through manipulation and coercion. Opposition figures and critical voices were restricted, press freedom curtailed, and dissent often suppressed. These actions compromised the genuineness of any claims of free elections.

2. Concentration of power: Despite being called the First Consul or Emperor, Napoleon effectively held authoritarian control over France. He centralized power in his own hands, ruling by decree, and suppressing rival political factions. The concentration of power and absence of a truly independent judiciary undermined notions of free and fair elections.

3. Lack of multi-party democracy: Napoleon's regime did not promote a multi-party system or allow for a broader range of political voices. Instead, power was largely concentrated within his own inner circle, limiting the ability of opposition parties to form and compete in elections.

Overall, while certain aspects of Napoleon's rule may suggest popular support and limited participation in decision-making, the manipulative nature of plebiscites and the concentration of power ultimately undermine the claim of him being a freely elected leader.