Posted by Miaow on Sunday, May 20, 2012 at 10:17pm.
I HAD to have actually heard "flip the less positive" didn't I? When I work it that way it seems to make sense.
The equation as you have it written isn't right. It doesn't balance by charge: +6 on the left and +2 on the right.
If you want the cell to be spontaneous as written then you write the more positive (less negative) REDUCTION first, then reverse the other one (and change the sign). So the equations are
Ag^+ + e ==> Ag Eo = 0.800
Sn^2+ ==> Sn^4+ + 2e Eo = -0.154
---------------------------------
Add equations. Add Eo.
I add the oxidation half equation to the reduction half equation to arrive at the Eocell.
If you "flip the less positive" (which is Sn in this case) you're doing the same thing. If you want Eocell you can do Eanode-Ecathode (both as reductions) = 0.800 -(+0.154) = 0.800-0.154 = ? and you arrive at the same number as if you add 0.800 + (-0.154)
Thank you for explaining! I think the balancing bit is my fault. I am getting tired and stupid. Time to go to bed and look at this closer in the morning.
I thank you for all your help this semester.
Related Questions
chemistry... HELP - Equilibrium constant question!!!? Standard reduction ...
Inorganic chemistry - I'm going to need some help getting this problem ...
Chemistry - Please check a Nernst equation for me? Calculate the cell potential ...
Inorganic chemistry - Calc1ulate E for the following electrochemical cell at 25 ...
chemistry - the activity series of metals is: Au < Ag < Cu <...
UCI Chemistry Webworks - For the following balanced equation: 2 Ag+ (aq) + Cu(s...
Chemistry - For the following balanced equation: 2 Ag+ (aq) + Cu(s) --->...
Chemistry - For the following balanced equation: 2 Ag+ (aq) + Cu(s)--> ...
Chemistry - For the following balanced equation: 2Ag+(aq) + Cu(s)<-&...
Chem - For this equation 2 Ag+ (aq) + Cu(s) <--> Cu2+ (aq) + 2 Ag...
For Further Reading