In 2001, President George W. Bush signed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). This bill called for large tax cuts just as the Economic Recovery Act of 1981 had and largely benefited the wealthiest Americans. President Bush’s approach to economics was very similar to that of President Reagan’s. Explain the assumptions behind the theory of supply-side economics, and describe the consequences of Reaganomics

assumptions: if government does not tax the rich, in their generosity or greed, they will make more money, spending more and more money to make wage earners rich.

Consequences: The benefits never appeard, except for the rich. Rich got richer, workers got poorer. But since the rich saw a battlecry that benefitted them, we now keep hearing the chant: Don't tax us, we are the guys who make the country a better place to live.

thank you bobpursley!

The theory of supply-side economics, often associated with Reaganomics, is based on several key assumptions:

1. Tax cuts stimulate economic growth: Supply-side economists believe that reducing tax rates, particularly for high-income individuals and businesses, can incentivize them to work harder, invest more, and create new jobs. The idea is that lower taxes provide individuals and businesses with more disposable income, thus encouraging spending and investment, ultimately leading to economic growth.

2. The Laffer Curve: One of the foundations of supply-side economics is the Laffer Curve, which suggests that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes government revenue. According to this theory, if tax rates are too high, they can discourage economic activity and hinder revenue collection. Conversely, reducing tax rates can lead to increased economic activity, which would compensate for the loss in tax revenue from lower rates.

3. Promoting efficiency and productivity: Supply-side economists emphasize the importance of reducing government regulations and bureaucracy to encourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and productivity. They argue that by allowing the free market to operate with minimal government intervention, businesses will have greater flexibility to grow and compete, which will ultimately benefit the overall economy.

The consequences of Reaganomics, or the implementation of supply-side economic policies during President Reagan's tenure, are subject to debate and interpretation. Some of the perceived consequences include:

1. Economic growth: Supporters of Reaganomics argue that the tax cuts implemented during Reagan's presidency contributed to significant economic growth. They point to the expansion of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), reduction in unemployment rates, and increased investment as evidence of the success of supply-side economics.

2. Inequality: Critics argue that Reaganomics widened income inequality by disproportionately benefiting high-income individuals and corporations. They contend that while the wealthy saw significant tax cuts and increased wealth, the middle class and lower-income groups experienced slower income growth and a shrinking social safety net.

3. Budget deficits: One criticism of Reaganomics is that the tax cuts, combined with increased military spending, led to substantial budget deficits. Critics claim that the revenue loss from the tax cuts was not fully offset by economic growth, resulting in increased national debt.

4. Trickle-down effect: Reaganomics proponents argue that the benefits of tax cuts and reduced regulations will eventually "trickle down" to all segments of society, leading to broad-based prosperity. Critics contend that this trickle-down effect did not materialize to the extent predicted, and instead, wealth became concentrated in the hands of the wealthiest individuals.

It is important to note that economists have differing opinions on the effectiveness and consequences of supply-side economics. Evaluating the impact of specific policies requires analyzing a range of factors and economic indicators.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=cqn%2Ccconf%3D0.95%2Cmin_length%3D2%2Crate_low%3D0.006%2Crate_high%3D0.006&gs_nf=1&pq=ip%20a&cp=21&gs_id=9&xhr=t&q=supply-side+economics&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=supply-side+economics&aq=0&aqi=g4&aql=f&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=d0f8cd49a0fc8cd2&biw=711&bih=453