The day after the internet went on strike, the Justice Department indicted 7 individuals and two companies who were a part of Megaupload.c--.

Research MegaUpload.c-- and the copyright infringement charges. Do you think MegaUpload is guilty of copyright infringement? Why or Why not? Do you think MegaUpload should be shut down? Why or Why not? How is this different from the case of Tiffany v. ebay?

TIFFANY v. EBAY

The Court’s decision was that Ebay had no liability for counterfeit Tiffany products listed on their website. I believe that the Court made the right decision because Ebay is simply a marketplace for buyers and sellers. It would not be profitable for Ebay to study in painstaking detail every one of the millions of products on its website to see if all of them were authentic or not. Ebay also has a sufficient number of safeguards to stop the sellers of lower-quality goods, such as the feedback system. Another concept to consider is the analogous institution to Ebay in the real world: the marketplace. If there is a counterfeit good sold in an open-air marketplace, for instance, the buyer and seller settle the issue, occasionally with the assistance of law enforcement and the court system. The marketplace is not held responsible.

To research MegaUpload.c-- and the copyright infringement charges, you can follow these steps:

1. Start by conducting a web search for "MegaUpload copyright infringement charges" or similar keywords. This will provide you with news articles and reliable sources discussing the case.

2. Look for reputable news websites like BBC, Reuters, or The New York Times that have covered the case. These sources usually provide detailed information and analysis.

3. Read multiple articles to gather different perspectives on the matter. This will help you gain a deeper understanding of the case and its implications.

4. Look for statements from the Justice Department or any official reports related to the charges. These sources provide official statements and legal arguments supporting the claims of copyright infringement.

It is important to note that as an AI, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions. However, I can provide you with some factors to consider when discussing whether MegaUpload is guilty of copyright infringement and whether it should be shut down:

1. Evidence of copyright infringement: Consider the evidence presented by the Justice Department and other parties in the case. Look for information about the specific nature of the copyrighted content shared through MegaUpload. Evaluate whether the evidence suggests a widespread and intentional pattern of copyright infringement.

2. Compliance with DMCA: Determine whether MegaUpload had a system in place to respond to takedown requests and remove infringing content promptly. If they failed to comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) requirements, it could strengthen the argument for copyright infringement.

3. User responsibility: Evaluate to what extent MegaUpload facilitated or encouraged copyright infringement by its users. If MegaUpload knowingly profited from illegal activities or provided tools primarily used for piracy, it could bolster the case against them.

Regarding the comparison to the Tiffany v. eBay case, there are some key differences:

1. Role of the platform: In the MegaUpload case, the platform itself was accused of directly facilitating copyright infringement by hosting and distributing copyrighted materials. In Tiffany v. eBay, eBay was seen as a third-party marketplace facilitating transactions between buyers and sellers, where counterfeit goods were being sold.

2. Notification and takedown: eBay had a system in place to respond to copyright infringement notices and remove infringing listings promptly. MegaUpload, on the other hand, was accused of not having sufficient mechanisms to address copyright infringement complaints.

3. Scale and business model: MegaUpload was accused of widespread and deliberate copyright infringement, with its business model allegedly being built around illegally distributing copyrighted content. In the Tiffany v. eBay case, counterfeit listings were considered a part of a larger platform used for legitimate transactions.

Remember to consider multiple perspectives and consult reliable sources when forming an opinion on whether MegaUpload is guilty of copyright infringement and whether it should be shut down.