Sunday
March 26, 2017

Post a New Question

Posted by on .

In the word ecologists, is eco the root morpheme or ology? Are the morphemes eco, log, y, ist, s or
ec, ology, ist, s ?

This is very confusing for me. Any explanation on how to find the root would be appreciated.

For example, on contributions are the morphemes con, trib, ute, ion, s or con, tribute, ion, s?

  • English - ,

    A good place to start is any good dictionary --

    www.dictionary.com
    www.onelook.com (there's a wide variety of dictionaries to choose from here)
    www.answers.com

    http://www.answers.com/topic/ecology-1
    Look under the definitions. You'll see the major parts of this word that came to us from the Greek. The root is -log- from the Greek word for words or study; the prefix is from the Greek word oikos (house) and -ist is the suffix that indicates "a person who..."

    I would divide up "ecologists" like this:

    eco
    log
    ist
    s

    Try again with "contributions."

  • English - ,

    Would log be the root in ecologists?

    contributions
    con
    tribu (t)(e)
    ion
    s

  • English - ,

    Yes, "log" is the root in "ecologists."

    I almost agree with what you wrote for "contributions" -- see what you think:

    con
    tribu
    tion
    s

  • English - ,

    I am confused because I think on the word contribute, tribute would be the root. I'm just confused about why this would change on contributions.

Answer This Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question