Posted by L.Bianchessi on Monday, January 23, 2012 at 12:49am.
I don't agree with your value for k.
k = 0.693/t1/2 = 0.0001209 Yr^-1
If we can detect 0.1 dpm, then
ln(15.3/0.1) = kt and solve for t. The web states that 58,000 to 62,000 years can be reliable determined by rediocarbon dating. This is in that ball park.
Oh, okay. Do I always use that equation for any order rxn involving time? How about the units, would it be yrs^-1 or just years?
How do you know what number goes on the top and bottom for the disintegration?
No. ln(No/N) = kt is good only for first order AND in it's complete form is ln(No/N) = akt.
No = number of atoms initially
N = number of atoms at time t.
Note: usually number; however, dpm, concn, or other initial/final states work as well. In this case I used 15.3 for No since that is the original dpm (disintegrations/min) and 0.1 dpm since that is the smallest the problem states that can be reliably determined.
If t1/2 is in years, then k is in years^-1 and t is in years. If half life is in seconds, then k is in seconds^-1 and t is in seconds.
Related Questions
Chemistry - The cloth shroud from around a mummy is found to have a carbon-14 ...
college Geol 101 - Suppose you have a sample of clamshell at a Paleoindian site ...
college geology help please - I was the same person from yesterday. I need help ...
college geology dealing with carbon 14 - ok in my professors notes he calculates...
chemistry - A 1.00-g sample of carbon from a modern source gave 15.3 ...
chemistry - A 1.00-g sample of carbon from a modern source gave 15.3 ...
geology - suppose you have a sample of clamshell at a paleoindian site and you ...
ChemB - measurements of carbon 14 taken from linen wrappings of the book of ...
Physics - When any radioactive dating method is used, experimental error in the ...
chemistry - A wooden object from a prehistoric site has a carbon-14 activity of ...
For Further Reading