Feaheny offered in writing to sell Quinn her house. She made an offer to sell on an installment payment basis, but also asked Quinn to make a cash offer. Quinn made a cash offer which Feaheny rejected. Quinn then accepted the installment payment basis. Feaheny refused to perform the contract and Quinn sued her. What should result

Based on the given scenario, Quinn made a cash offer, which was rejected by Feaheny. However, Feaheny then offered to sell the house on an installment payment basis, to which Quinn accepted. Subsequently, Feaheny refused to perform the contract and Quinn took legal action by suing her.

In this situation, the outcome should favor Quinn. Here's the explanation for this:

1. Offer and Acceptance: Feaheny initially made an offer to sell the house on an installment payment basis. This offer was accepted by Quinn, forming a valid contract. Acceptance must be consistent with the terms of the offer, and in this case, Quinn's acceptance matched the installment payment terms.

2. Rejection of Cash Offer: When Quinn made a cash offer, Feaheny rejected it. By not accepting Quinn's cash offer, Feaheny effectively terminated that counter-offer. Therefore, the initial offer for installment payments remained valid, and Quinn's acceptance of it created a binding contract.

3. Breach of Contract: Feaheny's refusal to perform the contract by selling the house on an installment payment basis constitutes a breach of contract. The refusal to fulfill contractual obligations could lead to legal consequences.

As a result, Quinn would likely be entitled to damages for Feaheny's breach of contract. The specific remedy may vary depending on the jurisdiction, but common remedies for breach of contract include compensatory damages, specific performance (forcing the party to fulfill their contractual obligations), or rescission (cancellation) of the contract.